Trend Micro's legal attack on ClamAV and Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)

US District Court Case
  1. Trend Micro's Initial Letter To Barracuda
  2. Barracuda's Request for Declaratory Judgement
  3. Trend Micros Answer and Counter Claim
  4. Barracuda's Answer to Counter Claim
  5. Joint Claim Construction Statement
  6. Trend Micro's Infringement Contention Against Barrracuda IM Firewall (ClamAV)
  7. Trend Micro's Infringement Contention Against Barrracuda Spam Firewall 1 (ClamAV)
  8. Trend Micro's Infringement Contention Against Barrracuda Spam Firewall 2 (ClamAV)
  9. Trend Micro's Infringement Contention Against Barrracuda Spam Firewall 3 (ClamAV)
  10. Trend Micro's Infringement Contention Against Barrracuda Web Filter (ClamAV)
  11. Trend Micro Rule 3-1 Disclosures
  12. Trend Micro Amended Rule 3-1 Disclosures
  13. Trend Micro Rule 3-1 Disclosure Attachements (details Trend Micro's Infringement Contentions for Barracuda and ClamAV)
Patent and Prior Art
  1. Trend Micro's Patent No 5623600
  2. Prior Art Example 1: Norman Data Defense Systems
  3. Prior Art Example 2: Norman Data Defense Systems
  4. Prior Art Example 3: Sidewinder and Virus Scans
  5. Prior Art Example 4: Network Security and Sidewinder
  6. Prior Art Example 5: Layland's “A Gateway to Internet Health and Happiness”
  7. Prior Art Example 6: Virus Detection at Domain Boundaries
  8. Prior Art Example 7: Ositis Gateway AV solution press release (01/28/03)
ITC Complaint
  1. ITC Complaint (Public)
  2. ITC Complaint Appendix A
  3. ITC Complaint Appendix B (1-110)
  4. ITC Complaint Appendix B (111-223)
  5. ITC Complaint Exs. 1-5
  6. ITC Complaint Exs. 6-9
  7. ITC Complaint Exs. 10-12
  8. ITC Complaint Exs. 13-15
  9. ITC Complaint Exs. 16-17
  10. ITC Complaint Exs. 18 (1-80)
  11. ITC Complaint Exs. 18 (81-160)
  12. ITC Complaint Exs. 19-24
  13. ITC Complaint Exs. 25 (1-142)
  14. ITC Complaint Exs. 25 (143-285)
  15. ITC Complaint Exs. 26-27
  16. Trend Micro Infringement Claim Chart
  17. Barracuda's Response to ITC Complaint
  18. Fourth Affirmative Defense: Unenforceability of the ‘600 Patent